114 results for 'cat:"Evidence" AND cat:"Search"'.
J. Cadish finds the trial court properly convicted defendant, by no-contest plea, for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Defendant was pulled over for driving without a license plate light. It was discovered he had an active warrant and he was arrested. Defendant moved to suppress a weapon found during a warrantless search of his vehicle on the basis that the search was not an inventory search, but a ruse to conduct an investigatory search. The search was reasonable under the totality of the circumstances, and no error is found in the court's denial of the motion to suppress. Affirmed.
Court: Nevada Supreme Court, Judge: Cadish , Filed On: May 9, 2024, Case #: 85564, Categories: evidence, Firearms, search
J. Pillard upholds the trial court's refusal to suppress evidence retrieved from defendant's cell phone during his trial on unlawfully trafficking and transporting firearms. The search warrant for the phone, which was found near a different suspect, relied on its association with that suspect and its evidentiary value, rather than ownership of the phone. Affirmed.
Court: DC Circuit, Judge: Pillard, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 22-3069 , Categories: evidence, Firearms, search
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Stevens upholds defendant's drug conviction and 40-year sentence. He argues that, since he was only staying at the apartment temporarily and was not the sole occupant of the apartment, the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he knowingly possessed methamphetamine. However, "the logical force of the evidence strongly links” defendant to the illegal drug. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Judge: Stevens, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 06-23-223, Categories: Drug Offender, evidence, search
J. Massing reverses an order partially allowing the defendant’s motion to suppress geographic location data from two mobile phones and a cell phone. The search warrant applications established probable cause to believe that the defendant used the phones during the period of time he’s suspected of committing crimes. Reversed.
Court: Massachusetts Court Of Appeals, Judge: Massing, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 23-P-21, Categories: Criminal Procedure, evidence, search
J. Deahl finds it is unclear whether defendant, who was convicted of firearm possession, consented to a search of his pocket after he was stopped by officers because he matched the description of an armed robber in that location. Upon remand, the trial court must determine whether defendant "freely and voluntarily" consented to the search.
Court: DC Court of Appeals, Judge: Deahl, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 22-CF-0520 , Categories: evidence, Firearms, search
J. Ruiz upholds the trial court's suppression of a firearm seized from defendant's backpack. The government failed to show defendant had abandoned the backpack when the officers retrieved it, without probable cause or a warrant, from a hidden spot within a home with which defendant had a connection. Affirmed.
Court: DC Court of Appeals, Judge: Ruiz, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 19-CO-1094 , Categories: evidence, Firearms, search
J. Tookey finds the trial court properly ruled that the state trooper had reasonable suspicion to expand the subject matter of the traffic stop. Defendant got his truck stuck in a ditch while attempting to turn around, and he displayed “shaking, which could be a physical symptom of present intoxication.” Affirmed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Tookey, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: A178918, Categories: evidence, search, Dui
J. Ginsburg upholds defendant's conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Contrary to defendant's argument, the trial court was not required to suppress evidence, as the officers' protective pat-down search was justified. Affirmed.
Court: DC Circuit, Judge: Ginsburg, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: 22-3024 , Categories: evidence, Firearms, search
J. Montgomery finds the lower court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence collected during the search of a vehicle. Defendant pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a weapon and theft of property, and received an effective 12-year sentence to confinement. During the course of a traffic stop, a stolen handgun was found under the driver’s seat of a vehicle the defendant was driving. Defendant argues officers did not have probable cause to search the vehicle, but the lower court determined that since one of the responding officers smelled marijuana coming from the vehicle, the odor established probable cause for the warrantless search. Affirmed.
Court: Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Judge: Montgomery, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: W2023-00713-CCA-R3-CD, Categories: evidence, Firearms, search
J. Abele finds the trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress in his guilty-plea case to trafficking in cocaine. His failure to use headlights at night gave the arresting officer probable cause to initiate a traffic stop, while his story he intended to stay in West Virginia for several days - one contradicted by his rental car agreement, which required the return of the vehicle to Chicago the following day - was enough to establish probable cause for a search with the officer's canine unit. Although the "field test" weight of the cocaine found in defendant's vehicle differed from that established by subsequent lab tests, the trial court properly admitted the cocaine into evidence because the prosecution established a proper chain of custody and the weight discrepancy was addressed by an expert witness at trial. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Abele, Filed On: April 10, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1460, Categories: Drug Offender, evidence, search
J. Erickson finds the lower court properly declined to suppress 66 pills, methamphetamine, and marijuana in defendant's trial for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. Defendant, who entered a conditional plea, contends the court improperly ruled that the search of his backpack had been voluntary, but evidence indicates that the mother of defendant's child was entitled to turn over the backpack, and that she consented to the search because her phone was inside. Affirmed.
Court: 8th Circuit, Judge: Erickson, Filed On: April 5, 2024, Case #: 23-2179, Categories: Drug Offender, evidence, search
J. Brennan reverses the suppression of 50 vials of THC and the defendant’s admission that he was doing something wrong to make some extra money. The police detective who stopped the defendant acted on a reasonable suspicion when he stopped him, based on the detective’s extensive background observing and intercepting drug transactions, and the seller and defendant’s behavior.
Court: Massachusetts Court Of Appeals, Judge: Brennan, Filed On: April 2, 2024, Case #: 23-P-358, Categories: Drug Offender, evidence, search
J. Kobes finds a lower court properly convicted a defendant for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The defendant argued that the lower court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of a rifle located in his vehicle under a towel after his girlfriend gave a police officer permission to search his car. However, the government sufficiently showed in court that the defendant's girlfriend was authorized to give consent after realizing that the police were not after her, and that the interactions were "cordial and polite." Affirmed.
Court: 8th Circuit, Judge: Kobes, Filed On: April 1, 2024, Case #: 23-1505, Categories: evidence, Firearms, search
J. Virden finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for meth possession with the purpose to deliver based on sufficient evidence. An officer staking out a known drug house saw defendant pull up in his vehicle, stopped him, and found baggies with meth on his person. Furthermore, a search of his vehicle yielded various amounts of meth, as well as baggies. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Virden , Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: CR-23-337, Categories: Drug Offender, evidence, search
J. Traynor finds that defendant's detention on suspicion of loitering was unreasonable because the supposed violation was based on a flawed understanding of the loitering statute, and so the subsequent investigative seizure and nonconsensual search that revealed a concealed firearm was unlawful. As such, the unlawfully seized evidence should have been suppressed by the trial court, which would have precluded a finding beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime was committed. Vacated.
Court: Delaware Supreme Court, Judge: Traynor, Filed On: March 21, 2024, Case #: 170, 2023, Categories: evidence, search
J. Lewis finds the trial court erroneously denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of his person. Although police had a warrant to search his residence, he was driving a few blocks away from the property when officers arrived, which rendered their traffic stop and detainment unconstitutional. Defendant was seen leaving his home immediately before he was pulled over, but because there was no suspicion of criminal conduct, officers were not permitted to search him or take his cell phone; therefore, because evidence from the phone permeated the entire trial, defendant's drug trafficking convictions will be vacated and the case remanded. Reversed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Lewis, Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-981, Categories: Drug Offender, evidence, search
J. Wiley finds that the trial court should have suppressed the gun police found in defendant's possession during an unlawful detention. A reasonable person would not have felt free to leave after police pulled their car so close to defendant's that he could only maybe squeeze out the door, and then shined their flashlights into the car from both sides. Reversed.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Wiley, Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: B328954, Categories: evidence, Firearms, search
J. Holloway finds the lower court properly convicted defendant of possession with intent to sell or deliver more than .5 grams of methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of a public elementary school, possession of drug paraphernalia, driving on a suspended license and violation of the financial responsibility law. During the course of a traffic stop outside an elementary school, defendant's vehicle was searched as a K-9 indicated the possible presence of narcotics. The lower court found the officers had probable cause for the traffic stop as they believed defendant was driving with his license suspended, officers also had a warrant for defendant’s arrest prior to the stop, and since defendant was on probation, his cell phone was subject to a warrantless search. Defendant received an effective sentence of 25 years incarceration. The instant court finds defendant is not entitled to relief in this matter. Affirmed.
Court: Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Judge: Holloway, Filed On: March 13, 2024, Case #: E2022-01661-CCA-R3-CD, Categories: Drug Offender, evidence, search
J. Joyce finds the trial court erred by failing to suppress evidence. “The officers’ reasonable suspicion of kidnapping had dissipated before the officers developed reasonable suspicion that defendant was a felon in possession of body armor.” Reversed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Joyce, Filed On: March 13, 2024, Case #: A177524, Categories: evidence, Firearms, search
J. Harrison finds the trial court properly convicted defendant by conditional guilty plea for charges related to drug and drug paraphernalia possession, and firearm possession. Defendant reserved the right to challenge the denial of his motion to suppress evidence recovered in a warrantless search of his pickup truck prompted by a drug dog alert. The dog died from cancer soon after the search, and its success record was lost due to a computer crash. The dog's alert was not the only fact contributing to probable cause. The officer also saw defendant's vehicle moving erratically and smelled marijuana inside. This alone can provide probable cause for a vehicle search. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Harrison , Filed On: March 13, 2024, Case #: CR-23-35, Categories: Drug Offender, evidence, search
[Consolidated.] J. Warren finds that the trial court properly granted defendant's motion to suppress evidence related to one victim's shooting death provided to a detective by defendant's previous attorney. Defendant was indicted for murder and other offenses. The attorney's disclosures violated attorney-client privilege. The state cannot mention the attorney as the source of any physical evidence given to the detective. The trial court correctly denied defendant's motion to suppress cell phone records related to both shootings. Both search warrants were supported by probable cause and the affidavits allowed the judges to reasonably infer that one of the target phone numbers belonged to defendant. Affirmed.
Court: Georgia Supreme Court, Judge: Warren, Filed On: March 5, 2024, Case #: S23A0900, Categories: evidence, Murder, search
J. Marcotte finds that defendant was properly convicted of attempted possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. In this case, a gun was found during a traffic stop with defendant as the only occupant in the car, and the gun was under the driver's seat and easily accessible. Further, the traffic stop for a broken taillight was valid, and defendant admitted to the officer that there was a gun in the car. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Marcotte, Filed On: February 28, 2024, Case #: 55,442-KA, Categories: evidence, Firearms, search
J. Joyce finds the trial court properly granted defendant’s motion to suppress evidence found after an officer stopped him for failing to perform the duties of a driver and asked him a series of questions. “Questions related to theft or possession of items that ‘don’t belong’ are not closely tied to elements of the offense of failing to perform the duties of a driver.” Affirmed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Joyce, Filed On: February 28, 2024, Case #: A179398, Categories: evidence, search
J. Murphy finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for drug trafficking and firearms charges. Officers conducted a search of defendant's home based upon information from a different investigation for theft, finding a white crystal substance in plain sight. The ensuing warranted search yielded several glass pipes, as well as digital scales and plastic bags containing particles of meth. Over three pounds of meth were also seized, as well as rifles and $16,000 in cash. Evidence concerning an untested substance was relevant and admissible, and not outweighed by any possible prejudice. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: v, Filed On: February 21, 2024, Case #: CR-23-103, Categories: Drug Offender, evidence, search
J. Smith finds a lower court properly denied a defendant's motion to suppress evidence in court. The defendant, who was charged for being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, argued that authorities searched his vehicle without probable cause. However, the government sufficiently showed in court that a police officer peered through the window of the defendant's vehicle, which smelled of marijuana, and saw the grip of a firearm protruding from the center console. Affirmed.
Court: 8th Circuit, Judge: Smith, Filed On: February 16, 2024, Case #: 23-1676, Categories: evidence, Firearms, search